On
26th
January, Jeremy Hunt apologised in Parliament, over the death of a
one year old boy from septicaemia. Hunt said: “Whilst any health
system will inevitably suffer some tragedies, the issues in this case
have significant implications for the rest of the NHS that I'm
determined we should learn from." (1)
But
how can he say he is “determined” to learn from it when the
changes brought in his government party lead to this boy’s death.
William
Mead (The one year old boy) died on 14th
December 2014 from septicaemia, secondary to pneumonia. The boy’s
parents had repeatedly taken him to his GP and repeatedly called to
NHS 111 about William’s deteriorating health. The official NHS
England report (Only published in January 2016) stated that if the
Call Handler (Non-clinically trained staff who answer NHS 111 calls),
who spoke to William’s parents the last time they called, had
recognised how seriously ill the child was, William’s death may
have been prevented (1). This is very demanding.
NHS
111 has been plagued with problems; poor staff training (3) using
untrained temporary staff and poor supervision of staff (3), claims
of being “dangerously understaffed” (4) and an uncomfortable lack
of clinical staff (5). In January this year; Integrated Care 24,
which handles NHS 111 and out-of-hours GP calls in Norfolk and
Wisbech, was criticised for not publishing a damning, leaked report
into their performance. The report stated that people had to wait 12
hours for a call-back, which caused significant patient safety
issues, a lack of GPs employed there and the poor level of staff
recruitment (2). This was over a year after William’s death.
To
be cynical it always looked like NHS 111 was brought in as a cheap
replacement to its predecessor, NHS Direct, but what other conclusion
can be drawn. NHS Direct employed experienced nurses to triage all
symptomatic callers (Any call about a person with medical symptoms)
and gave them appropriate advice, these nurses were employed on the
equivalent of Band 6 and above. With NHS 111 all calls are triaged by
non clinical call handlers, using computer algorithms (a computerised
assessment system), which seems to be a tick-box assessment. These
call handlers only have six weeks training (6). They do not have the
clinical experience to recognise when something is wrong, when
symptoms do not sound “right”, when there are complications that
increase the severity of a person’s symptoms. There are nurses
available in the call centres but they don’t triage calls, they are
there to advice the call handlers. There have also been whistleblower
claims that NHS 111 is short of these nurses (5).
I
used to work for NHS Direct (Back at the beginning of the millennium)
as a Nurse Advisor. Telephone Triage (Assessing patients over the
telephone) is a difficult and complicated skill, because you cannot
physically examine the person so you have to carefully talk to them
to get a “picture” of their symptoms. I couldn’t have safely
done that without the years of nursing experience I had built up
before starting that job to call on. Many of the people I spoke to
had a poor basic knowledge of their bodies, what is normal and what
are symptoms of illness. I do not know how we can expect non-clinical
call handlers to do this complicated assessment, it is more than just
reading questions off a screen.
I
have repeatedly turned down offers of jobs at NHS 111 in the last
four years and always for the same reason, I do not feel it is
clinically safe and I don’t want to work for a clinically unsafe
organisation. It may sound selfish, but I want to keep my
registration as a nurse.
Unfortunately
I do not see NHS 111 improving any time too soon. Jeremy Hunt has
proved very deaf to the concerns of healthcare professionals and this
Government has reduced their spending on the NHS (7). Are they
willing to spend the money it will take to make NHS 111 a safe
service?
Drew
Payne
No comments:
Post a Comment